Archive for February, 2010

Subscription-based PSMS services (2010)

Sunday, February 28th, 2010


The high charges for mobile content and the open-ended nature of m-payment systems has resulted in customers ending up with very high bills, and this has resulted in literally hundreds of thousands of complaints from all around the world – in Australia alone close to 10,000. This, of course, has attracted political and regulatory attention and the industry was put under pressure to clean up its act, through a new Industry Code.

In what was certainly a genuine attempt to make the system more transparent and manageable for customers, most carriers began to promote subscription-based services, rather than the per-item charge that often resulted in bill shock for the customers. They ‘forced’ the PSMS to move their services to such models and currently three-quarters of all PSMS services are billed in this way.

Double ‘opt-in’ industry code

In the 2007/08 year, the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman (TIO) received almost 14,000 complaints about PSMS, and 96% of them were about subscription services. Subscription services typically involve periodic text messages, with each message attracting an individual charge. Of particular concern was the fact that 97% of these complainants claimed they had not knowingly agreed to the subscription.

The TIO drew the following conclusions:

  • consumers are confused about the notion of ‘subscription’ mobile premium services;
  • ways of cancelling MPS are not readily available or easy to activate; and
  • content suppliers and carriage service providers seem not to be addressing complaints about MPS promptly or efficiently.

This led to the introduction of a new Industry Code and additional buttressing measures from the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA), aimed at tightening the rules around the provision of PSMS.

The service provider determination will:

  • require all content providers to be registered; and
  • require mobile carriage service providers to provide the option of barring PSMS on all plans by mid-2010, so that consumers can choose to block these services should they wish to do so.

The register will be set up by industry; however the service provider determination will also allow for content providers whose products do not comply with the new rules to be deregistered. This will effectively prevent them from supplying services to the Australian market.

The Code is designed to address community concerns regarding the operation and supply of PSMS, and imposes obligations on carriers and content providers that aim to iron out a range of problems with which the sector has seemingly become plagued.

These obligations include:

  • procedures to be followed for subscribing to PSMS;
  • the banning of advertisements targeted at children under 15;
  • strict rules about how advertisements and charges are displayed; and
  • improved complaints-handling obligations for companies supplying PSMS.

A very important development of the new Code is a ‘double opt-in’ mechanism which means that a prospective customer will need to give two independent confirmations of a request before they can be taken to have subscribed to an ongoing PSMS service.

M-payment monopoly

However, the inherent flaws in the entire mobile media business model have not been addressed.

The mobile operators own a very powerful tool without which the content and service providers can’t operate their business. This monopolistic situation enables them to offer their m-payment system on a take-it-or-leave-it basis, ie, do a lucrative revenue sharing deal with me and I will let you charge your customers via the telephone bill.

This powerful tool allows operators to extract revenue payments of 40% and more from these content providers. As mentioned above, margins of this type are often only available in the adult entertainment market and in personal services such as horoscopes, games and gambling.

The nature of this business model is such that it also attracts dubious entrepreneurs, as well as true pioneers.

As the revenue-sharing deals required by the carriers are very expensive, the kind of services that can be offered are limited, and some companies are going to great lengths to find loopholes and other ways to make money. As these people are often clever entrepreneurs, and the carriers are rather slow-moving, some short-term benefits are achieved. They make a quick buck and then shut down (or are thrown off the service).

In the meantime they have done untold damage to the genuine players and to the market in general.

Mobile operators become the regulators

While the culprits are often caught and banned from access to the mobile operators’ billing systems, in the end it is the mobile operators who are blamed for the problems. In the courts they are often told in no uncertain terms that they have a responsibility to protect customers who are being ripped off through their mobile services.

More often the courts also cite the poor customer service offered by the operators as a key reason for the problems. Operators are making it very difficult for customers to complain – hour-long waiting times at call centres, lack of toll-free complaint numbers, lack of detailed billing information, and so on. In addition, and even more problematic, sometimes the operator blames the off-deck content provider and/or the aggregators, and vice versa, leaving the customer stranded in the middle.

Conflicts of interest

The fact that the carriers are becoming the defacto regulators complicates matters as they often don’t have a genuine interest in promoting the PSMS market. They compete with these players through their own proprietary portals.

Some carriers are more liberal than others, but such conflicts of interest make life very difficult for the independent content and services providers operating in the market.

This is an increasingly international market; most major players operate worldwide. There are, of course, advantages to this, but at the same time the complex regulatory system is forcing many of these players to become more involved in legal issues and bureaucracy than in the development of innovative new services, and this is hampering innovation.

See also: Australia – Mobile Media – PSMS Portals and Apps

We invite your comments: Comments Off on Subscription-based PSMS services (2010)

Big Mobile

Friday, February 26th, 2010

Australian company Big Mobile has partnered with News Digital Media, Optus, and Vodafone Hutchison Australia, to represent platforms including, moshtix, TrueLocal, Planet 3, Vodafone live!, and Optus Zoo, with a total audience reach said to be over 4 million unique users.

Commonwealth Bank, Fitness First, McDonald’s, Domino’s, and Sanitarium have already conducted mobile ad campaigns through the company.

See also: Australia – Mobile Data – M-Commerce & M-Payment

We invite your comments: Comments Off on Big Mobile

Africa growth outlook 2010

Friday, February 26th, 2010

BuddeComm has updated its entire range of Africa market reports and comes to the following conclusions:

  • Mobile market penetration in Africa is expected to pass 50% during 2010;
  • At least eight African countries will have broken the 100% mobile penetration barrier by the end of the year;
  • While some African mobile markets are still growing at more than 100% p.a.; overall growth across the continent is expected to slow to 17%;
  • Revenues of African 3G operators are expected to exceed US$7 billion in 2010;
  • The first 20Mb/s mobile broadband service is expected in Africa in 2010;
  • The 2010 FIFA World Cup in South Africa is expected to deliver a boost to Mobile TV services which have been launched in at least ten African countries;
  • Mobile broadband and mobile banking services are key drivers for African operators to increase ARPU, but mergers and acquisitions are expected to intensify in an increasingly crowded market.

For more information, see BuddeComm’s range of Africa reports:

We invite your comments: Comments Off on Africa growth outlook 2010

South Africa big on Twitter and Facebook

Friday, February 26th, 2010

South Africa is making a significant contribution globally towards the growth of social networking portals. Research by Sysmos indicates that South African users made up 0.85% of the total interaction on Twitter in 2009 which makes them the eighth largest sample population globally, accounting for roughly 470,000 of the website’s monthly user base of 55 million. South Africa has more Twitter users than Japan, China, Spain and the Netherlands. The largest user group is in the US, which accounts for more than 60% of Twitter’s active membership.

South Africans also represented 1.9 million of the 300 million Facebook users in 2009, placing the country in the 25th position globally. Their number has grown by over 100% during 2009, making South Africa one of the fastest growing markets worldwide.

For more information, see BuddeComm’s updated report:

South Africa – Convergence – VoIP, NGN & Digital Media.

We invite your comments: Comments Off on South Africa big on Twitter and Facebook

NBN and rural Australia

Friday, February 26th, 2010

Given that it is regional Australia we have to thank for taking the initiative to highlight the need for the NBN, it puzzles me that since the plans for the NBN were announced there has been utter silence from those early supporters of a first-class telecoms network for the bush. As a consequence NBN Co, which has an already overloaded program, is more than happy not to make regional Australia a priority.


Where are the Barnaby Joyces and Fiona Nashes, who championed this cause during the mid-00s? They deserve full credit for having played a key role in getting us the NBN in the first place, but where are they now, at the critical time of implementation?


At the start of the current version of the NBN I argued that NBN Co could have some early wins by using wireless technologies to provide regional Australia with a head-start – even if some of that technology were to eventually be replaced by fibre networks.


True, there are design and architecture issues to tackle but if regional Australia had kept up the pressure they most certainly would have been among the first cabs off the rank.


It looks as though those who advocated regional broadband were, in the end, more interested in their own politics than in the welfare of their regional communities.


The Liberal Opposition has made the issue a political one and ignores the fact that there is basically universal support for the NBN. They dismiss the NBN outright, without even trying to come up with a positive contribution to the debate on this national infrastructure development. The Nationals seem to have been caught in the negative political web also, and they are now seriously letting their regional constituents down. There certainly has not been a decrease in interest from regional Australia; however it is in desperate need of champions – otherwise they will simply remain at the end of the long NBN queue.


Paul Budde


For further information see:

Australia – National Broadband Network – Competition and Regulations

Australia – National Broadband Network – Deployment Strategies

Australia – National Broadband Network – Early Projects

Australia – National Broadband Network – Government’s Trans-Sector Conference

Australia – National Broadband Network – Industry at crossroads

Australia – National Broadband Network – NBN Co and Infrastructure

Australia – National Broadband Network – Overview and Analysis

Australia – National Broadband Network – Telstra

Australia – National Broadband Network based on Trans-sector model

Australia – National Broadband Network Municipal Networks

Australia – National Broadband Network Trans-sector projects

We invite your comments: Comments Off on NBN and rural Australia